<p>Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis on Tuesday described the Nagpur violence as a premeditated conspiracy, stating that the mob deliberately targeted specific houses and establishments. The unrest erupted on Monday during a protest over Mughal emperor Aurangzeb’s tomb, leading to widespread vandalism of homes and vehicles. In response, authorities imposed a curfew in multiple areas of Nagpur to prevent further escalation.</p> <p>Addressing the legislative assembly, Fadnavis revealed that 33 police personnel, including three deputy commissioners, were injured in the clashes. A senior officer was even attacked with an axe, underscoring the intensity of the violence. Among the injured, at least 12 were high-ranking officials, including deputy commissioners of police.</p> <p>Fadnavis, who also holds the Home portfolio, assured that strict action would be taken against those who assaulted police personnel. "The mob targeted specific houses and establishments. The attack appears to be a planned conspiracy," he said. Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde echoed similar concerns, claiming that the violence was orchestrated to target a specific community.</p> <p>The situation in Nagpur remains tense, with authorities maintaining a heavy police presence in sensitive areas. Investigations are underway to identify those responsible, and officials have assured that perpetrators will not be spared. Meanwhile, curfew measures continue as a precautionary step to restore law and order.</p> <p>Disclaimer: This image is taken from PTI.</p>

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh has once again criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi, this time over the recent agreements between Indian telecom giants and Elon Musk’s SpaceX. SpaceX has partnered with Airtel to introduce its Starlink satellite internet services in India. Just a day later, Mukesh Ambani’s Jio Platforms also signed a deal with SpaceX. While Airtel’s Sunil Mittal welcomed the partnership, the Congress party has alleged that these agreements were orchestrated by the prime minister to strengthen ties with US President Donald Trump through Musk. In a post on X, Ramesh questioned how both Airtel and Jio, which had previously raised concerns about Starlink’s entry into India, signed agreements with SpaceX within just 12 hours of each other. He pointed out that their past objections seem to have vanished overnight, raising doubts about the transparency of the deal. National Security Concerns: Ramesh also raised serious concerns about national security, questioning who would have control over Starlink’s connectivity in India. He asked whether the power to switch services on or off in times of crisis would rest with Starlink or its Indian partners. Additionally, he inquired whether other satellite-based internet providers would be allowed to operate and under what conditions. Beyond the Starlink deal, he also sought clarity on Tesla’s manufacturing plans in India, suggesting that facilitating Starlink’s entry could be part of a larger commitment to Musk’s companies. A Surprising Turn of Events: The partnership between Jio and SpaceX came as a surprise, considering the ongoing rivalry between Mukesh Ambani and Elon Musk over satellite internet airwave allocation. Until recently, both Jio and Airtel had been pushing for a spectrum auction, arguing that an administrative allocation would allow Musk to gain access to airwaves at a much lower cost than what telecom companies had paid in previous auctions. With questions looming over the implications of these deals, the Congress party is demanding greater transparency and accountability from the government. Disclaimer: This image is taken from PTI.

A senior lawyer appointed by Reform UK to independently investigate allegations against MP Rupert Lowe has refuted statements he claims she made. Lowe, the Great Yarmouth MP, was suspended by the party and referred to the police over accusations of making violent threats against Reform's chairman. The Metropolitan Police confirmed they are assessing a complaint about "verbal threats." Additionally, allegations of bullying within Lowe’s office are being investigated by the lawyer hired by Reform UK. Lowe has denied all allegations, calling them baseless and labeling himself a victim of "political assassination" for questioning Nigel Farage. Last week, he claimed to have spoken with the lawyer, who allegedly told him she was "shocked" at the process and that no evidence had been presented. However, on Sunday, the lawyer, a KC whose identity remains undisclosed but whose credentials have been verified by the BBC, issued a statement contradicting Lowe. She clarified: "I have seen statements attributed to me by Mr. Lowe MP regarding my reactions to the party’s investigation process. I must correct the record—I have never expressed ‘dismay’ or ‘shock’ at any point, nor have I stated that there is ‘zero credible evidence’ against him, let alone repeatedly said so." Lowe, in response to the lawyer’s statement, doubled down on his position, insisting no evidence had been provided against him. He maintained that the KC had been requesting evidence but had received none. "I have spoken with the KC at length over the phone and via messages. She has been helpful and professional, despite the difficult position Reform has placed her in," he said. On Friday, Reform UK released a statement confirming an independent investigation, which Lowe dismissed, claiming the lawyer was "dismayed" that such an announcement was made before the inquiry had even begun. Reform also alleged Lowe had refused to cooperate with the investigation, a claim he called "an outright lie." Lowe has since consulted his legal team and intends to take legal action, asserting, "I won’t let my reputation be destroyed as part of a political assassination just because I dared to question Nigel Farage. You have to stand up to bullies, and that’s exactly what I’m doing." His suspension followed an interview with the Daily Mail, in which he criticized Reform under Farage's leadership as "a protest party led by the Messiah." As a result, Reform removed the party whip, leaving Lowe as an independent MP. Reform UK spokeswoman Ann Widdecombe acknowledged the controversy as "temporarily damaging" but dismissed concerns about its long-term impact. Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Westminster Hour, she remarked, "All political parties face disruptions like this from time to time. We should allow the investigation to conclude before making any judgments." Disclaimer: This image is taken from BBC.

A court in Lucknow has imposed a Rs 200 fine on Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi for failing to appear in a defamation case related to his remarks on Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, a key figure in India's independence movement. The case, dating back to November 2022, accuses Gandhi of making derogatory remarks about Savarkar during a rally in Akola, Maharashtra, as part of his Bharat Jodo Yatra campaign. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Alok Verma had earlier directed Gandhi to appear on March 5, 2025, after finding prima facie evidence suggesting that his remarks could promote enmity and disturb public harmony. Gandhi’s legal team filed a plea seeking exemption from personal appearance, citing official commitments, including meetings with foreign dignitaries. However, the court rejected the request, stating that sufficient notice had been provided. As a result, a Rs 200 cost was imposed, payable to the complainant’s lawyer. The next hearing is scheduled for April 14. What is the Savarkar Defamation Case?: The case originates from a speech delivered by Gandhi on November 17, 2022, during his nationwide Bharat Jodo Yatra, a campaign aimed at fostering unity. In his speech, Gandhi reportedly called Savarkar a British collaborator, alleging that he received a pension from the colonial government. These remarks triggered strong reactions, prompting Advocate Nripendra Pandey to file a criminal complaint, arguing that Gandhi’s statements defamed Savarkar, caused social disharmony, and personally distressed him. Initially, in June 2023, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ambrish Kumar Srivastava dismissed the complaint. However, the sessions court later revived the case, directing the magistrate’s court to reconsider the allegations. This led to a summons being issued in December 2024, compelling Gandhi to appear in court. Disclaimer: This image is taken from PTI.

<p>Pippa Crerar and Kiran Stacey analyze whether the strong opposition to the government's proposed benefit cuts could force a policy reversal. They also explore which other government departments might experience severe budget reductions.</p> <p>Disclaimer:This Podcast is taken from The Guardian.</p>

After months of speculation, the government is set to unveil its plans for reforming the benefits system. Keir Starmer has criticized the current system as “the worst of all worlds,” but with significant cuts to disability payments under consideration, could these changes disproportionately harm the most vulnerable? And will Labour MPs be willing to back them? John Harris discusses the issue with Tom Pollard, head of social policy at the New Economics Foundation, and Guardian columnist Gaby Hinsliff. Disclaimer:This Podcast is taken from The Guardian.

Pippa Crerar and Kiran Stacey speak with Ed Miliband, the energy security and net zero secretary, about Labour’s strategies for addressing the climate crisis, the proposed third runway at Heathrow, and the challenges of achieving a greener future in the Trump era. Disclaimer:This Podcast is taken from The Guardian.

Donald Trump clashed with Canada, Mexico, Ukraine, U.S. veterans, and every Democrat in Congress during his State of the Union address. Disclaimer:This Podcast is taken from The Guardian.