India’s BrahMos supersonic cruise missile has gained greater international attention following its reported use during Operation Sindoor in May 2025, with BrahMos Aerospace chief Jaiteerth R. Joshi highlighting the operation’s role in strengthening the weapon system’s global reputation. The missile’s operational deployment has added to its appeal among potential international buyers as India seeks to expand defence exports and strengthen its position in the global arms market.

BrahMos, jointly developed by India and Russia, is a supersonic cruise missile designed for precision strikes against land and maritime targets. Its high speed, operational flexibility and ability to be launched from different platforms have made it an important component of India’s conventional military capabilities. Operation Sindoor, launched in May 2025 following the Pahalgam terror attack, brought renewed attention to India’s precision-strike capabilities. The reported use of BrahMos during the operation has provided additional visibility for the missile as countries assess modern weapons systems for their defence requirements.

BrahMos had already secured international interest before the operation. India signed its first export agreement for the missile system with the Philippines in January 2022, marking a significant step in the country’s efforts to become a major defence equipment supplier. Subsequent export agreements involving countries in Southeast Asia have further strengthened its international presence.

The growing interest comes as India works to increase domestic defence manufacturing and reduce its dependence on imported military equipment. Expanding BrahMos production could also create opportunities for Indian companies involved in precision engineering, electronics and other specialised manufacturing sectors. Alongside export expansion, BrahMos Aerospace is pursuing the development of the smaller BrahMos-NG variant. The next-generation missile is intended to offer greater integration flexibility, particularly for aircraft, although its final capabilities and operational readiness will depend on further development and testing.

The company is also examining future missile technologies, including a proposed longer-range variant. Such projects would require additional research, engineering work and cooperation between the Indian and Russian partners. Despite the increased attention, converting international interest into additional contracts will depend on several factors, including pricing, production capacity, delivery schedules and long-term maintenance support. The growing profile of BrahMos highlights India’s broader ambition to establish itself as a reliable exporter of advanced defence technology. With operational experience adding to its international visibility, the missile could play an increasingly important role in the country’s defence export strategy.

Disclaimer: This image is taken from India Today.

Student leaders who once fought for freedom of expression and the right to question authority must uphold the same principles when they move into positions of power, highlighting the importance of democratic values and accountability in India’s educational institutions. Student politics has historically played a significant role in raising concerns over university policies, students’ rights and broader social issues. Campus movements have provided young people with opportunities to challenge decisions, demand transparency and participate in democratic debate.

Concerns arise when individuals who previously supported protests and questioned authority become less tolerant of criticism after gaining influence. The contradiction highlights a key challenge for democratic leadership: ensuring that the right to express disagreement remains protected regardless of who holds power.

Universities are expected to encourage independent thinking and open discussion. Students often raise questions about academic policies, campus administration, discrimination and other issues affecting their education. Allowing peaceful disagreement can help institutions identify problems and improve decision-making.

Freedom of expression, however, does not mean that all forms of protest are unrestricted. Educational institutions have a responsibility to maintain safety, prevent violence and ensure that academic activities continue without unnecessary disruption. The challenge is to distinguish peaceful dissent from conduct that genuinely threatens the rights or safety of others.

Transparent rules, fair disciplinary procedures and proportionate responses can help universities balance these responsibilities. Students should be able to express their concerns without facing arbitrary punishment, while institutions should retain the authority to address legitimate violations of established rules.

The debate also carries implications for political leadership. Student organisations often serve as training grounds for future politicians and public representatives. Those who build their public identities around demands for accountability are expected to demonstrate the same commitment when they become decision-makers. Democratic principles lose their credibility when freedom of expression is defended only when it benefits a particular political group. Leaders must be willing to hear criticism even when it challenges their own decisions or questions their authority.

The right to peaceful protest and freedom of expression remains an important part of democratic participation in India, subject to constitutional and legal limits. Protecting these rights requires consistent standards from political leaders, university administrations and student organisations alike. The credibility of former student leaders depends not only on the causes they championed in the past but also on how they exercise authority in the present. Preserving space for peaceful disagreement is essential to maintaining trust, encouraging independent thought and strengthening democratic institutions.

Disclaimer: This image is taken from Hindustan Times.

United Nations human rights experts have criticised India’s handling of youth-led protests, raising concerns over alleged excessive use of force, mass detentions and restrictions on peaceful demonstrations. The experts have urged Indian authorities to investigate reported violations and ensure that the rights of protesters are protected.

In a statement, the experts expressed concern over the treatment of students, activists, journalists, lawyers and other participants involved in demonstrations in New Delhi and elsewhere. They called for an independent and impartial investigation into allegations of police misconduct and urged authorities to hold those responsible for any established violations accountable.

The protests, which initially focused on issues such as examination paper leaks, have expanded to include concerns over the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. Demonstrators have questioned the removal of names from voter lists and demanded the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

According to reports cited by the UN experts, thousands of people were detained during the demonstrations in Delhi. The experts also raised concerns about alleged baton charges, injuries, confiscation of mobile phones and the deletion of protest-related material. They called for particular attention to reports of ill-treatment and gender-based abuse involving women protesters.

The experts further questioned restrictions on public gatherings, reported internet disruptions and the use of surveillance technologies in connection with the protests. They stressed that any restrictions on peaceful assembly must comply with human rights standards and be necessary and proportionate to legitimate public safety concerns.

The electoral revision has become a major point of contention between opposition groups and the authorities. Critics fear that eligible voters could be excluded from electoral rolls, while the Election Commission has maintained that the exercise is intended to improve the accuracy of voter lists by identifying duplicate, deceased and otherwise ineligible entries.

The Indian government has previously rejected criticism from the UN human rights office over the handling of the demonstrations, describing such comments as interference in the country’s internal affairs. Authorities have maintained that law enforcement agencies operate within the framework of the law. The UN experts have called on India to ensure that peaceful protesters can exercise their rights without facing unjustified restrictions. They have also urged the authorities to investigate the allegations thoroughly, provide appropriate remedies to victims of any proven violations and take steps to prevent similar incidents in the future.

The controversy has renewed debate over the balance between maintaining public order and protecting democratic freedoms. As concerns surrounding electoral transparency and the treatment of young demonstrators continue to attract attention, the handling of the allegations could have implications for public confidence in law enforcement and democratic institutions.

Disclaimer: This image is taken from ANI.

Nationalist Congress Party leader Zeeshan Siddique has raised concerns over public safety after alleging that he received four threats in the past two months. His remarks came following a reported firing incident involving Bollywood actor Tiger Shroff in Mumbai, bringing renewed attention to security arrangements and law enforcement in the city. Speaking to ANI on October 18, Siddique questioned the adequacy of his security arrangements and asked why his protection had not been increased despite the alleged threats. He also expressed concern about whether ordinary citizens could feel safe amid reports of violent incidents.

The reported firing incident involving Tiger Shroff has sparked fresh discussion about the safety of prominent personalities and the risks posed by gun violence in densely populated areas. Police investigations are expected to establish the circumstances surrounding the incident and identify those responsible.

Siddique’s concerns also come against the backdrop of the killing of his father, former Maharashtra minister Baba Siddique, who was shot dead in Mumbai on October 12, 2024. The murder sent shockwaves through the state’s political circles and raised questions about the protection of public figures. Following the latest developments, Zeeshan Siddique has reiterated his demand for a thorough investigation into his father’s murder. He has also called for further questioning in connection with the case, stressing the need to establish accountability through the legal process.

The developments have renewed debate over threat assessment procedures, intelligence gathering and preventive policing in Maharashtra. Security experts have often emphasised the importance of evaluating threats promptly and taking appropriate action before they escalate into violence. The incident has also raised broader questions about public confidence in law enforcement. Residents expect authorities to respond effectively to reports of threats, investigate violent crimes and ensure that public spaces remain safe. The focus now remains on the police investigation into the reported firing incident and the assessment of Siddique’s allegations. Further verified details from the authorities are likely to clarify the circumstances of the case and any additional security measures that may be considered.

Disclaimer: This image is taken from Hindustan Times.

A new round of demonstrations led by India’s youth-driven Cockroach movement has faced a government crackdown under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, alongside the closure of a long-standing protest venue in Delhi. Two prominent leaders of the movement have reportedly been jailed for five days over alleged violations of restrictions on protests. Initially sparked by concerns over education and unemployment, the demonstrations have expanded to focus on voting rights. The government rejects allegations that it intends to exclude millions of people from the electoral process. However, its handling of the protests has drawn criticism from the United Nations and Amnesty International, prompting broader concerns about democratic freedoms in India. In this report, Lucy Hough speaks with South Asia correspondent Hannah Ellis-Petersen about the protests and their wider political implications.
Disclaimer: This podcast is taken from The Guardian.

Prime Minister Lawrence Wong has announced a broad set of initiatives covering family support, housing, technology and Singapore’s national resilience. Hairianto Diman and Justine Moss speak to SMU School of Law Associate Professor Eugene Tan about the major measures, their significance for Singaporeans and what they reveal about the Government’s priorities for the country’s next stage of growth.
Disclaimer: This podcast is taken from CNA.

Myanmar's military government has released rare images of detained leader Aung San Suu Kyi meeting a Red Cross official, marking her first known contact with the outside world since the 2021 coup. The photos were released just ahead of junta chief Min Aung Hlaing's first official visit to Thailand, prompting speculation about their political significance.

Disclaimer: This podcast is taken from CNA.

In a conversation with political editor Tom McIlroy and chief political correspondent Dan Jervis-Bardy during the 50th Labor conference in Adelaide, South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas discussed his state’s political battle with One Nation. He said progressive groups should avoid dismissing or talking down to Pauline Hanson’s supporters, arguing that their concerns need to be understood rather than ignored. Addressing the ongoing debate over the AUKUS submarine deal, Malinauskas acknowledged concerns after the US revealed that Virginia-class submarine production rates had not improved. However, he maintained that walking away from the agreement would create greater strategic risks than the challenges surrounding the controversial defence partnership.

Disclaimer: This podcast is taken from The Guardian.