In the complex and often tense dynamics between China and its global counterparts, the idea of a "reset" in relations periodically emerges in political discourse. However, the reality is far more nuanced, and a true reset with China is not realistically achievable in the near term. Several factors contribute to this challenging reality, rooted deeply in political, strategic, and economic considerations.

Firstly, China's rising global influence and assertiveness have fundamentally altered the landscape. Over recent decades, China’s economic power and geopolitical reach have surged, shifting the balance in its favor compared to many countries, including India and Western democracies. This ascent has diminished the incentives for China to engage in conciliatory resets, as it now wields greater leverage to advance its own interests without needing to accommodate demands.

Secondly, unresolved territorial disputes and mutual mistrust continue to cloud diplomatic efforts. For example, the border conflicts between China and India stretch over thousands of kilometers, with rival claims entrenched in every sector. Despite long-standing mechanisms aimed at de-escalation, such as the Special Representatives talks initiated in 2003, progress has been minimal. These deep-rooted issues create significant barriers to a reset, as trust is a crucial prerequisite for any meaningful diplomatic breakthrough.

Moreover, the global strategic environment complicates matters further. Countries like India are wary of allowing China to shape or limit their international partnerships due to concerns over sovereignty and regional influence. Attempts to reset ties have often faced setbacks amid competing ambitions such as China’s Belt and Road Initiative and its alliances in the region, which complicate India’s and others' strategic calculations.

A reset, if at all considered, would require substantial political will and a shift in mindset. For instance, India must balance its strategic autonomy with the reality of China’s power, and both nations would need to prioritize mutual trust over suspicion to foster constructive dialogue. However, such a political decision is not straightforward and is impeded by historical grievances, ongoing border tensions, and geopolitical rivalries.