News
CJP Leaders Saurav Das, Ashutosh Ranka Sent to 5-Day Judicial Custody Over Jantar Mantar Trespassing Case

Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) members Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka have been sent to five days of judicial custody in connection with an alleged trespassing incident at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar protest site, according to media reports. The two were detained on Tuesday after CJP members allegedly entered the restricted premises despite police restrictions on demonstrations at the location. Another party member, Ajinkya Shinde, was reportedly released on a personal bond.
The incident occurred during a protest against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. CJP members have been raising concerns over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and demanding the election chief’s resignation. According to reports, party members entered the premises by crossing barricades and a gate. Videos shared by CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke reportedly showed demonstrators carrying flags as they made their way into the site.
Delhi Police had removed Jantar Mantar from the list of designated protest venues under an order issued on October 11. Ramlila Maidan, Burari Ground and CBD Ground were among the locations identified for demonstrations. Police have alleged that the detained members violated restrictions and breached undertakings related to maintaining peace. Das and Ranka were subsequently produced before a Special Executive Magistrate, who ordered five days of judicial custody. CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke criticised the action, questioning the authorities’ response to the protest. The party has framed the incident as an issue concerning political dissent and the right to demonstrate.
Jantar Mantar has historically served as a prominent venue for protests in the national capital. The latest incident has renewed debate over restrictions on public demonstrations and the enforcement of rules governing designated protest sites. The allegations against Das and Ranka remain subject to legal proceedings. Their placement in judicial custody does not constitute a finding of guilt.
Disclaimer: This image is taken from The Hindu.



