Politics

Education and Inequality in Pakistan Shaping Political Awareness and Civic Life in 2025

Published On Thu, 09 Oct 2025
Sanchita Patel
23 Views
news-image
Share
thumbnail

  "We are committed to improving access to quality education for all (2024),” declared Dr. Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui, Pakistan’s Federal Minister for Education

                                                                                                                        and Professional Training."  

  

Education stands as the cornerstone of every society and the most powerful instrument for fostering prosperity, equality, and transformation. It cultivates critical thought, moral discernment, and social awareness, fundamental traits for meaningful civic participation and progress. Through education, individuals gain the capacity to think independently, discern right from wrong, and contribute to social advancement. By transforming minds, education transforms societies, making it an indispensable force for social change and development. 

Yet, a walk through the classrooms of Pakistan reveals a stark contradiction to these ideals. Public schools remain overcrowded, underfunded, and reliant on rote learning, excluding most children from low-income and rural communities. Meanwhile, private institutions in urban centers thrive, offering modern curricula, student councils, and Model UN activities, luxuries beyond the reach of the majority. Pakistan’s educational framework remains profoundly stratified, both reflecting and reinforcing socio-economic divisions. The three parallel systems—public schools, private institutions, and madrasahs, function in isolation, serving distinct social classes and shaping divergent political and civic identities. 

  

Public Schools: Education for the Poor Public

educational institutions predominantly cater to low-income households, particularly in rural or economically disadvantaged areas. These institutions mostly lack basic facilities such as obsolete curriculum, a lack of qualified teachers, and poor infrastructure. The educational approach in these settings emphasizes basic literacy and rote memorization, providing scant opportunities for developing critical thinking skills, civic education, or political consciousness. Therefore, the students typically acquire only basic understanding of political systems and governmental structures. 

The absence of meaningful civic and governmental education in the curriculum further prevents students from understanding their rights and responsibilities as citizens, thereby weakening democratic participation and social cohesion. In essence, Pakistan’s public education system, rather than serving as a vehicle for equality and empowerment, often reinforces cycles of poverty and marginalization. The system fails to adequately cultivate leadership or promote democratic engagement, consequently perpetuating systemic disparities and limiting the social and political empowerment of students. 

  

Private Schools: Elite Education and Political Literacy 

Private educational institutions in Pakistan predominantly serve the middle- and upper-income strata, primarily located in city centers. These educational establishments differentiate themselves through enhanced infrastructure, advanced learning materials, and highly qualified educators, thereby distinguishing themselves from the beleaguered public education system. By implementing international or contemporary curricula, such as the British O- and A-Level frameworks or the International Baccalaureate, they accord considerable importance to disciplines such as political science, ethics, and global studies. 

Co-curricular initiatives, including debates, Model United Nations assemblies, and student governing bodies, further foster leadership qualities, critical thinking

capabilities, and civic participation among the student body. Nevertheless, access to such high-quality education remains restricted to individuals possessing considerable financial resources, rendering it a privilege rather than a fundamental right. This selectivity reinforces class divisions, consolidating political awareness and leadership prospects within affluent demographics. As a result, while private educational institutions cultivate self-assured and globally informed citizens, they concurrently exacerbate structural inequities. Rather than facilitating collective advancement and national unity, they perpetuate a framework whereby educational privilege translates into political and social hegemony, thereby marginalizing the majority from substantial engagement in civic affairs. 

  

Madrasahs: Religious Education with Limited Civic Exposure 

Madrasahs in Pakistan have historically functioned as affordable educational options for underprivileged communities, providing access to basic literacy and  religious instruction where government schools are absent or inadequate. Their academic programs mainly concentrate on Quranic studies, Hadith, Islamic jurisprudence, and Islamic history, often framing political and social understanding through religious rather than democratic or civic perspectives. While some progressive religious schools have begun including secular subjects like mathematics and science, most remain largely disconnected from comprehensive civic education. 

The studies suggest that involvement of the community in the governance of madrasahs, through the engagement of parents, local leaders, and religious

authorities, can augment transparency, accountability, and social cohesion. Such reforms could better integrate religious schools with national educational standards while reducing radicalization risks and promoting civic awareness. Historically, madrassahs expanded under British colonial rule to address gaps left by underfunded local educational institutions. Following the September 11 attacks, international attention has often linked religious schools with extremism, despite the fact that the vast majority continue providing essential educational, social, and community services for marginalized groups. 

  

Pakistan’s three educational streams public schools, private institutions, and madrasahs, differ in access, quality, and civic engagement, yet systemic inequities persist, particularly along gender and geographic lines. Of 46 million students, only 21 million are female, with literacy at 51 percent compared to 74 percent for men. Rural girls’ secondary enrollment is just 28 percent versus 47 percent in urban areas, reflecting entrenched socio-cultural and economic barriers that limit

social mobility and political awareness. The tripartite system reinforces inequality: public schools perpetuate poverty and political apathy, private schools
consolidate elite privilege, and madrassahs isolate students from civic and secular engagement. State promises of educational reform have failed to materialize, systematically limiting opportunities for girls and undermining the development of an empowered and politically aware youth.  

  

Malala and the Fight for Girls’ Education Amid Violence 

Nowhere is this contradiction more visible than in the story of Malala Yousafzai, whose near-fatal shooting by the Taliban for advocating girls’ education revealed the peril of defying entrenched patriarchal and ideological structures. While the world celebrated her courage, within Pakistan she became the target of

hostility, conspiracy, and defamation, a reflection of the deep-seated misogyny and denial embedded in the nation’s sociopolitical fabric. Even as the state paraded her global recognition as a symbol of progress, it neglected the systemic rot that made her struggle necessary. 

In this context, Malala’s experience is not merely an isolated incident but rather a reflection of Pakistan’s educational duplicity: a nation that exalt resistance on the international stage while stifling dissent domestically. The tripartite educational system functions as both a manifestation and a perpetuator of this contradiction, a structure that favors a select  few, placates the impoverished, and penalizes the courageous. Until Pakistan confronts this internal discord, its rhetoric of “education for all” will persist as an empty slogan, concealing a framework founded on exclusion, fear, and the betrayal of its youth. 

  

Conclusion 

Pakistan’s education system epitomizes structural inequality, sustained by its tripartite hierarchy of public schools, private institutions, and madrassahs. This model divides students along class and ideological lines, entrenching inequities that undermine national cohesion and democratic development. Public schools reproduce poverty and political apathy, private institutions consolidate elite privilege, and madrassahs isolate students from civic and secular engagement, collectively denying youth especially girls, the agency for genuine social transformation. 

  

The state’s claims of reform starkly contrast with its failure to enact meaningful change, exemplified by Malala Yousafzai’s near-fatal shooting for advocating

girls’ education. While celebrated globally, she faced hostility and defamation at home, reflecting Pakistan’s entrenched misogyny and ideological denial. Her
experience reveals the duplicity of a system that venerates resistance abroad while suppressing dissent domestically. Until Pakistan confronts these
contradictions, its rhetoric of “education for all” remains an empty slogan, masking a framework built on exclusion, fear, and the betrayal of its youth.  
Disclaimer: This image is taken from New York Daily News.